Difference between revisions of "Sample Entry: Guidelines"

From UKEPIGRAPHY
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Admin ukepig moved page Test: Invented Inscription to Sample Entry: Guidelines without leaving a redirect)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{InscriptionTemplate|  
 
{{InscriptionTemplate|  
Title=rubble|
+
Pub=The standard publication (Corpus or ''SEG'' reference) and/or Ed. Pr.|
Ref=Bootle123|
+
Summary=brief description of the inscription|
Summary=load of old crap|
+
Type=e.g. decree, epitaph, altar, dedication, etc|
Type=Decree|
+
Object=e.g. stele, plaque, etc |
Object=Stele|
+
Material=stone (with type, if known) or metal|
Material=stone|
+
Standort=City or region, and precise location if known|
Dimensions=quite big|
+
Fundort=City or region, and precise location if known|
Date=Olden Times|
+
InscriptionDate=exact date or a range|
Provenance=Somewhere Foreign|
+
Dimensions=height, width, thickness |
Main publication=''IvonBootle'' 1|
+
Layout= e.g. stoichedon|
Other bibliography=''ZPE'', passim}}
+
Writing=style of lettering, distinctive features|
 +
Condition=complete or fragmentary; any damage|
 +
Decoration=relief, moulding, etc|
 +
Location=e.g. store, display, etc|
 +
Collector=Name of collector, if known|
 +
CollectionDate=Date when the collector acquired the inscription, and/or date on which it was added to this collection|
 +
CollectionRef=Catalogue reference or accession number|
 +
Translation=text or link to published translation|
 +
Bibliography=key bibliography; follow ''CQ'' citation style|
 +
URLs=[http://www.example.com link title]|
 +
Images=upload or provide links, where available}}

Latest revision as of 17:22, 23 April 2014


Modern Publication(s): significant editions (in chronological order, starting with the earliest)

Brief description: summary of inscription content


Attributes

Inscription Type: e.g. decree, epitaph, altar, dedication, etc

Object Type: e.g. stele, statue base, plaque, etc

Material: stone (with colour and type, if known; acknowledge the person who made the claim about the colour/type) or metal

Original Location: City or region, and precise standort if known, with reference to modern scholarship if appropriate; if appropriate, state line number if place of publication stated on stone

Provenance: Fundort (if known); v. important to acknowledge references and controversies

Date: exact date, or a range, and reference to relevant controversies/scholarship. Use BC/AD.

Dimensions: height, width, thickness (in that order; expressed in metres if possible). If we have not autopsied, then acknowledge the publication the measurements have come from.

Layout: e.g. stoichedon, number of rows or columns

Writing: style of lettering, distinctive features

Condition: complete or fragmentary; any damage (with acknowledgements if not by autopsy)

Decoration: relief, moulding, etc


Collection

Location: include specific location info (e.g. on display) if known. If location uncertain, offer notes on the date of latest observation.

Collector(s): name of earliest collector(s), if known; name of donor to collection; notes on intermediary owners could usefully be noted here.

Date collected: Date when the earliest known collector acquired the inscription, and/or date on which it was added to this collection .

Accession or catalogue number: Catalogue reference or accession number


Translation

Translation, or link to published translation

Bibliography

Give major bibliography, in this form. List in alphabetical order by surname of author:

E. Kalinka, Tituli Asiae Minoris II. Tituli Lyciae linguis Graeca et Latina conscripti, Fasc. 1, nos. 1-395, Pars Lyciae occidentalis cum Xantho oppido (Vienna, 1920), no. 261.

A. Michaelis, Ancient Marbles in Great Britain (Cambridge, 1882), 345-7

H. A. Ormerod, 'Greek Inscriptions in the Museum of the Liverpool Royal Institution,' Annals of Archaeology and Anthropology 6 (1914), 99-108 at 106-8.

Web Links

link title


Image(s)

Images or information about location of images